Autism - Running The Country

Originally published at Age of Autism

rtah-photo-2-editedsmall

I’m the author of We’re Monsanto: Feeding the World, Lie After Lie, Book I and Book II. Last February, Steve Shore invited me to speak about the problems with the GMO industry at The Real Truth About Health Conference in September. I told Steve I was currently researching the topic of corruption in the vaccine industry and I asked him, “If I promise to have a book written and published before the conference, would he consider letting me speak on the subject of vaccines?” Steve said yes.

jabbed-cover Seven grueling months later and three days before the conference started, I published Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment and Government Stick It to You and Your Family. (Paperback and Kindle editions)

My first day at the conference I joined a panel discussion with Dan Olmsted, Mark Blaxill and Del Bigtree. Their names and works grace the pages of Jabbed, so meeting them in person was an honor.

dell-bigtree The next evening, Del sat on a panel with five other people, all experts in various aspects of pharmaceutical industry corruption. One after another, every person said essentially the same thing: Big Pharma is broken in a big way. Del, last in the line-up, said in essence, “I agree with everything that’s been said and it’s all true for the vaccine industry.”

Boom! The energy on the panel shifted. Most of the faces hardened. Most of the backs stiffened. How dare this Bigtree guy speak evil against the miracle of vaccines? Who is he anyway? Everyone knows that vaccines don’t cause autism. There was this doctor back in the 90s that made that claim. He’s a fraud. Everybody knows that.

It would be wrong to say that Del made some of the other “experts” on the panel look foolish. They managed that feat well enough on their own. Del, on the other hand, rocked the panel. The audience loved him, just as thousands of other audiences have come to love him.

allen-francis Allen Francis M.D. was seated next to Del. Dr. Francis was the Chair of the DSM-IV Task Force. The DSM, or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, is the so-called Bible for psychiatrists, psychologists and other mental health professionals. Allen was so disgusted with the latest edition of the DSM—the DSM 5—that he authored a book titled, Saving Normal: An Insider’s Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life. The premise of the book is that modern psychiatry has pathologized normal behaviors and in so doing has trivialized the practice of psychiatry. In the world of psychiatry, Dr. Francis is hot stuff. And yet, the venerable doctor proved to possess no knowledge about vaccines and vaccine science beyond what the average consumer of mainstream media possesses.

In his exchange with Del, Allen acted out the role of a kind-hearted father counseling an overzealous son, placing his hand on the back of Del’s neck, tenderly, if not patronizingly, telling Del that he’s too extreme in his presentation, that he would be more convincing if he were more moderate. Allen assured Del that he couldn’t imagine a world without the benefit of vaccines.

Del took it all in stride, laughing collegially with his newly appointed mentor. But Del also pressed forward informing Allen, the other uninformed panelists, and the audience that vaccines are not held to the same safety standards of other pharmaceutical drugs. Neither has the vaccine schedule ever been tested for safety.

Del and Dr. Francis continued their discussion after the panel had ended. Allen told Del that he had won some points. He didn’t know that vaccines and other drugs have different safety standards or that the vaccine schedule has never been tested. He said those things need to change. How many doctors would have had the humility to admit their ignorance under similar circumstances?

Another panelist who shall remain unnamed was still angry at Del the following morning. Her reaction is far too familiar to tens of thousands of parents of vaccine-injured children who have been victimized by doctors who are themselves victims of self-inflicted ignorance, anger, and blind certainty.

Witnessing the power of the vaccine paradigm over the minds of otherwise intelligent people—experts, no less—was both beautiful and terrifying. People such as these are both victims and perpetrators in one of the greatest rackets in history.

The fireworks on the panel that evening are nothing compared to the fireworks the world will witness in the coming months and years when an army of vaccine informed individuals will do battle and defeat one of the most corrupt, if not the most corrupt industry in the history of the world: the pharmaceutical industry.

Freedom emerges out of tyranny, and revolution is the path to freedom. That statement is not a call to arms; it’s historical fact. The only question that remains is when will vaccine sociopaths have injured and killed enough of us to spark the revolution?

Dr. Andrew Wakefield gave the answer: “Now is the time to overthrow the corporate rule of this country and to bring the power back to the people.”

—

Brett Wilcox, Licensed Professional Counselor, author, Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment and Government Stick It to You and Your Family. (Paperback and Kindle editions)

Vaccines are safe and effective, right?

Not according to the CDC’s own studies and not according to hundreds of other studies conducted around the world.

Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies summarizes the findings of 400 vaccine-related scientific papers. Considered one by one, the findings are disturbing. For example:

“Thimerosal-containing vaccines continue to be administered on a regular basis to potentially the most vulnerable populations: pregnant women and children (especially in developing countries). Given this, we believe it is high time to reassess the rationale for using thimerosal, a known immune and neurotoxic substance, in human vaccines.”
(Tomljenovic Ll, Dorea JG, et al. Commentary: a link between mercury exposure, autism spectrum disorder, and other neurodevelopmental disorders: Implications for thimerosal-containing vaccines. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 2012; 18(1):34-42.)

“Evidence has now emerged showing that autism may in part result from early-life immune insults induced by environmental xenobiotics. One of the most common xenobiotic with immune-stimulating as well as neurotoxic properties to which infants under two years of age are routinely exposed worldwide is the aluminum vaccine adjuvant.”
(Shaw CA, Sheth S, et al. Etiology of autism spectrum disorders: genes, environment, or both? OA Autism 2014 Jun 10; 2(2): 11.)

“The yearly U.S. mass influenza vaccination campaign has been ineffective in preventing influenza in vaccine recipients. Vaccine recipients need to be informed of the limitations and risks of the vaccine and of the alternatives to vaccination. In particular, they need to know of the possibility that repeated vaccinations may increase the risk of adverse effects.”
(Geier DA, King PG, et al. Influenza vaccine: review of effectiveness of the U.S. immunization program, and policy considerations. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2006 Fall; 11(3): 69-74.)

“Under universal varicella vaccination, there has been a vaccine-induced decline in exogenous boosting. We estimate universal varicella vaccination has the impact of an additional 14.6 million herpes-zoster cases among adults aged under 50 years during a 50-year time span at a substantial cost burden of 4.1 billion U.S. dollars or 80 million U.S. dollars annually.”
(Goldman GS. Cost-benefit analysis of universal varicella vaccination in the U.S. taking into account the closely related herpes-zoster epidemiology. Vaccine 2005 May 9; 23(25): 3349-55.)

Most disturbing are the numerous studies cited in Miller’s book that expose the truth about pro-vaccine “science.” Following are a few examples:

“Vaccine manufacturers have financial motives and public health officials have bureaucratic reasons that might lead them to sponsor research that concludes vaccines are safe.”
(DeLong G. Conflicts of interest in vaccine safety research. Account Res 2012; 19(2): 65-88.)

“For most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.”
(Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PloS Med 2005 Aug; 2(8): e124.)

“The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law. Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”
(Lenzer J. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: protecting the private good? BMJ 2015 May 15; 350; h2362.)

When considered as a whole, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies exposes the people who shape the vaccine paradigm for what they are: self-serving criminals pumping out chemical cocktails based on fraudulent research operating within a liability-free industry/governmental relationship who are more than willing to injure or kill you and your children to maximize current and future profits.

Whether you use Miller’s book to inform your vaccine-related decisions or to inform your legislators’ vaccine-related votes, Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies will serve as one of your most valuable resources.

Category: Autism

Getting Real at the Real Truth Health Conference

Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies, a Valuable Resource